Media is actually a triathlon - consume, produce, share - My TV has no Mouse
May 2nd, 2008Gin, Television, and Social Surplus
This is something that people in the media world don’t understand. Media in the 20th century was run as a single race–consumption. How much can we produce? How much can you consume? Can we produce more and you’ll consume more? And the answer to that question has generally been yes. But media is actually a triathlon, it ’s three different events. People like to consume, but they also like to produce, and they like to share.
Although experiencing this via a liner video is somewhat ironic, you must stop what you’re doing right now and watch this video.
From now on, that’s what I’m going to tell them: We’re looking for the mouse. We’re going to look at every place that a reader or a listener or a viewer or a user has been locked out, has been served up passive or a fixed or a canned experience, and ask ourselves, “If we carve out a little bit of the cognitive surplus and deploy it here, could we make a good thing happen?” And I’m betting the answer is yes.
Wow, I’ve been writing about consumer attention scarcity up here the past few years. Clay talks about this concept of cognitive surplus which at the end of the day is reallocated attention from pure consumption to a consume, produce, and share model.
Just like in the Matrix where there is no spoon, in the mass media matrix there is no mouse.
Technorati Tags: Attention, Clay Shirky
Clay Shirky
Clay Shirky, cognitive surplus, Media 2.0, mouse, TV






